You are not authorised to view this resource.
You need to login or register as a member. click here to go to the membership page now.

Case Of The Week - mdct

 

Author: Charbel Saade

Institute: Section Chief CT Radiographer

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia

Patient Presentation

 

A 57 year old male patient presents to ER with Severe upper abdominal pain, Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and loss of appetite. On examination the patient demonstrates Steatorrhea- pale, foul-smelling and oily stool.

 

Anatomy

Pathophysiology

Because the pancreas is located in the retroperitoneal space with no capsule, inflammation can spread easily. In acute pancreatitis, parenchymal edema and peripancreatic fat necrosis occur first. This process is known as acute edematous pancreatitis.

When necrosis involves the parenchyma, accompanied by hemorrhage and dysfunction of the gland, the inflammation evolves into hemorrhagic or necrotizing pancreatitis.

Pseudocysts and pancreatic abscesses can result from necrotizing pancreatitis because of enzymes being walled off by granulation tissue (ie, pseudocyst formation) or bacterial seeding of pancreatic or peripancreatic tissue (ie, pancreatic abscess formation). Ultrasonography or, preferably, CT can be used to detect both.

The inflammatory process can cause systemic effects because of the presence of cytokines, such as bradykinins and phospholipase A. These cytokines may cause vasodilation, increase in vascular permeability, pain, and leukocyte accumulation in the vessel walls. Fat necrosis may cause hypocalcemia. Pancreatic B-cell injury may lead to hyperglycemia.

Causes

The major causes are long-standing alcohol consumption and biliary stone disease.

  • In developed countries, the most common cause of acute pancreatitis is alcohol abuse.
    • On the cellular level, ethanol leads to intracellular accumulation of digestive enzymes and their premature activation and release.
    • On the ductal level, ethanol increases the permeability of ductules, which allow enzymes to reach the parenchyma, resulting in pancreatic damage.
    • Ethanol increases the protein content of the pancreatic juice and decreases bicarbonate levels and trypsin inhibitor concentrations. This leads to the formation of protein plugs that block the pancreatic outflow and obstruction.
    • Another major cause of acute pancreatitis is biliary stone disease (eg, cholelithiasis, choledocholithiasis). A biliary stone may lodge in the pancreatic duct or ampulla of Vater and obstruct the pancreatic duct, leading to extravasation of enzymes into the parenchyma.
  • Minor causes of acute pancreatitis
    • Medications, including azathioprine, corticosteroids, sulfonamides, thiazides, furosemides, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), mercaptopurine, methyldopa, and tetracyclines
    • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
    • Hypertriglyceridemia (When the triglyceride [TG] level exceeds 1000 mg/U, an episode of pancreatitis is more likely.)
    • Peptic ulcer disease
    • Abdominal or cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, which may insult the gland by ischemia
    • Trauma to the abdomen or back, resulting in sudden compression of the gland against the spine posteriorly
    • Carcinoma of the pancreas, which may lead to pancreatic outflow obstruction
    • Viral infections, including mumps, coxsackievirus, cytomegalovirus (CMV), hepatitis virus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and rubella
    • Bacterial infections, such as mycoplasma
    • Intestinal parasites, such as Ascaris, which can block the pancreatic outflow
  • Vascular factors, such as ischemia or vasculitis

 

CT Severity Index

 

It is critical to identify patients who are at high risk for severe disease, since they require close monitoring and possible intervention.
Early staging is based on the presence and degree of systemic organ failure (cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal) and on the presence and extend of pancreatic necrosis.

Balthazar et al constructed a CT severity index (CTSI) for acute pancreatitis that combines the grade of pancreatitis (A-E) with the extent of pancreatic necrosis.


The CTSI assigns points to patients according to their grade of acute pancreatitis - which can be determined on a non-contrast CT as well as a contrast-enhanced CT - as well as the degree of pancreatic necrosis - which requires the use of intravenous contrast material.


More points are given for a higher grade of pancreatitis and for more extensive necrosis.


Scanning Technique

 

 

Scanner

Content

Protocol

Pancreatitis - Portal Venous Abdomen

Scanning Range

2 cm above the diaphragm to 2 cm below hte symphisis pubis

Scan direction

Cranio-caudal

Detetector Collimation

64 x 0.6 mm

kVp

120

mA

250

Rotation Time (ms)

500

Pitch

0.9 mm

DLP (mSv)

Reconstruction Thickness

1.0 x 0.7 mm

Reconstruction Kernel

B31f - Smooth

 

Contrast

Ultravist 370

Site of Cannulation

Rt Sided Cubital fossa

Contrast Volume

100 mls

Saline Volume

80 mls

Contrast Flow rate

3.5 mls/sec

Level of Dynamic Scan

n/a

Type of Triggering

Fixed Scan Delay - 60 seconds

ROI

n/a

 

Imaging Studies


  • CT is the most reliable imaging modality in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The criteria for diagnosis are divided by Balthazar and colleagues into 5 grades as follows:
      • Grade A - Normal pancreas
      • Grade B - Focal or diffuse gland enlargement
      • Grade C - Intrinsic gland abnormality recognized by haziness on the scan
      • Grade D - Single ill-defined collection or phlegmon
      • Grade E - Two or more ill-defined collections or the presence of gas in or nearby the pancreas
  • The use of contrast material intravenously is yet to be proved detrimental on the microcirculation of the pancreas in cases of severe necrotizing pancreatitis.

 

 

Images

 


Comments:

There is no additional value of an early CT (within 72 hours) in patients with acute pancreatitis.
The diagnosis is usually made on clinical and laboratory findings. An early CT may be misleading concerning the severity of the pancreatitis, since it can underestimate the presence and amount of necrosis.
Early CT is only recommended when the diagnosis is uncertain, or in case of suspected early complications such as perforation or ischemia.

Diagnosis

A Transaxial Portal Venous phase scan was acquired of the abdomen from the lower thoracic cavity to below the pubic symphisis. There is an obvious stranding around the head and mid portion and tail of the pancreas which is highly consistant with acute pancreatitis. There is extensive stranding of inflammation between the tail of the pancreas and the inner fossa of the spleen. There is also an incidental finding of liver cirrohsis which could be possibly linked to excessive acohol consumption.

 

Complications

  • Infected pancreatic necrosis may result from seeding of bacteria into the inflammation.
  • An acute pseudocyst is an effusion of pancreatic juice that is walled off by granulation tissue after an episode of acute pancreatitis.
  • Hemorrhage into the GI tract retroperitoneum or the peritoneal cavity is possible because of erosion of large vessels.
  • Intestinal obstruction or necrosis may occur.Common bile duct obstruction may be caused by a pancreatic abscess, pseudocyst, or biliary stone that caused the pancreatitis.
  • An internal pancreatic fistula from pancreatic duct disruption or a leaking pancreatic pseudocyst may occur.

Clinical outcome

The 1992 Atlanta Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis has classified this entity into a mild acute pancreatitis and a severe acute pancreatitis.


80-85% of cases of acute pancreatitis run a mild course without the development of multiple organ failure.

This group has a mortality of < 1%.


15-20% of cases of acute pancreatitis run a serious clinical course with pancreatic necrosis and the development of multiple organ failure.

 

Of these, pancreatic necrosis remains sterile in 60% of patients, whereas in 40% of these patients the necrosis becomes infected.

 

This last category of patients has the highest mortality rate of 25-70%.

The information contained in this monthly case presentation is for educational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon for desirable practice of medical Imaging in any department. Any health care practitioner and technician reading this information is reminded that they must use their own learning, training and expertise in dealing with their individual patients as per their specific departmental protocol. This material does not replace that duty and is not intended by Charbel Saade to be used for any purpose in that regard.

The drugs and doses described are consistent with the scanning protocol, however, before administration, dose selection and contrast type, careful patient analysis should be adhered to according to departmental policy and procedure. Charbel Saade releases himself from any medico-legal issues relating to poor scanning and interpretation of information from this case study.As a guide to all please use your specific departmental protocols and consult with referring physicians regarding each individual patient..

 

 
We would love to know how you rate this website?
1 is excellent and 5 is poor